Nilai-Nilai Budaya dalam Tradisi Knduri Sko Pada Masyarakat Desa Tebing Tinggi Kabupaten Kerinci
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63863/jce.v3i2.364Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan mengkaji nilai-nilai budaya yang terdapat dalam tradisi Kenduri Sko pada masyarakat Desa Tebing Tinggi, Kecamatan Siulak Mukai Kabupaten kerinci Provinsi Jambi. Tradisi tersebut merupakan bagian dari warisan adat yang masih dilestarikan dan memiliki peran strategis dalam memperkuat identitas budaya serta kohesi sosial masyarakat. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatifPengumpulan data dilakukan melalui teknik observasi, wawancara mendalam, dan dokumentasi dengan melibatkan tokoh adat, tokoh masyarakat, serta warga sebagai informan. Analisis data dilakukan melalui tahapan reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tradisi Kenduri Sko mengandung berbagai nilai budaya, seperti gotong royong, musyawarah, solidaritas, penghormatan terhadap leluhur, serta nilai religius. Nilai-nilai tersebut tercermin dalam setiap rangkaian pelaksanaan tradisi dan berfungsi dalam mempererat hubungan sosial serta mempertahankan keberlangsungan adat istiadat. Namun demikian, perkembangan globalisasi dan modernisasi menjadi tantangan tersendiri bagi keberlanjutan tradisi ini, terutama di kalangan generasi muda.
Downloads
References
Adams, K. M. (2018). Tourism and cultural heritage. Annals of Tourism Research, 68, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2017.11.006
Appadurai, A. (2016). The future as cultural fact: Essays on the global condition. Verso. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373810
Bebbington, A., Guggenheim, S., Olson, E., & Woolcock, M. (2018). Exploring social capital debates. Journal of Development Studies, 54(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2017.1353790
Castells, M. (2018). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Durkheim, E. (2016). The elementary forms of religious life. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315821924
Eliade, M. (2019). The sacred and the profane: The nature of religion. Harcourt.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of sampling techniques. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Geertz, C. (2017). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129730
Giddens, A. (2020). The consequences of modernity. Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781509540914
Habermas, J. (2018). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001
Harrison, R. (2018). Heritage: Critical approaches. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315477411
Haryanto, J. T. (2020). Local wisdom and cultural resilience. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences, 12(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.7454/jiss.v12i2.123
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2016). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790881
Koentjaraningrat. (2016). Pengantar ilmu antropologi. Rineka Cipta.
Kvale, S. (2018). Doing interviews. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716665
Logan, W., Langfield, M., & Craith, M. N. (2019). Cultural diversity and heritage. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315811055
Lorelli S. Nowell, Jill M. Norris, Deborah E. White, & Nancy J. Moules. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria Show all. International Journal of Qualitative Methods.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.
Nasution, Z. (2022). Social cohesion in traditional societies. Asian Social Science, 18(4), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v18n4p55
Putra, R. (2019). Ritual adat dan identitas budaya lokal. Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, 40(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.7454/ai.v40i1.5678
Rahman, F. (2020). Religious values in local traditions. Religions, 11(3), 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11030145
Rahmawati, Y., Nugroho, A., & Fitriani, D. (2021). Local wisdom values in Indonesian society. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877920904137
Sari, D., & Abdullah, I. (2021). Cultural tradition and social integration. Humaniora, 33(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v33i2.65432
Schwartz, S. H. (2017). The refined theory of basic values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116682807
Sibarani, R. (2018). Kearifan lokal: Hakikat, peran, dan metode tradisi lisan. Asosiasi Tradisi Lisan.
Smith, L. (2016). Uses of heritage (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263
Smith, L. (2021). Uses of heritage (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315613031
Suryani, N. (2019). Gotong royong and social solidarity. Komunitas, 11(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v11i1.18000
Sutrisno, S., Widodo, W., & Suryani, N. (2020). Local wisdom in Indonesian culture. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(3), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.17499/jsser.2020.03
Sutton-Smith, B. (2021). The Ambiguity of Play. In The Ambiguity of Play. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1q16s5b
Turner, V. (2017). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134666
UNESCO. (2017). Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage. https://doi.org/10.18356/aa55d0e3-en
UNESCO. (2022). Intangible cultural heritage and sustainable development. UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.18356/ich2022
Wahyudi, A. (2021). Cultural education for young generation. Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.31219/jcs.v15i3.789
Waterton, E., & Watson, S. (2019). The Palgrave handbook of contemporary heritage research. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69856-4
